Comments on: G is for “Gone with the wind” http://haidhuru.blogsome.com/2006/09/15/g-is-for-gone-with-the-wind/ haidhuru (adverb), all right. haidhuru (adverb), it does not matter. haidhuru (adverb), OK. haidhuru (conjunction), no harm. (dhuru v). haidhuru (verb conjugated), never mind. (dhuru v). Wed, 20 Aug 2008 19:27:48 +0000 http://wordpress.org/?v=1.5.1-alpha by: www.catch-cheating.com http://haidhuru.blogsome.com/2006/09/15/g-is-for-gone-with-the-wind/#comment-639 Fri, 17 Aug 2007 16:17:11 +0100 http://haidhuru.blogsome.com/2006/09/15/g-is-for-gone-with-the-wind/#comment-639 <strong>www.catch-cheating.com</strong> The vital thing to remember is that you\'ll need to be easy-going. www.catch-cheating.com

The vital thing to remember is that you\’ll need to be easy-going.

]]> by: Gish http://haidhuru.blogsome.com/2006/09/15/g-is-for-gone-with-the-wind/#comment-533 Thu, 21 Sep 2006 16:28:05 +0100 http://haidhuru.blogsome.com/2006/09/15/g-is-for-gone-with-the-wind/#comment-533 Am with you Do not confirm or deny!!! and also shut up dont tell him your past let it be. Whenever i meet my ex with company i smile and say hi and then look away then its nothing to debate about. Am with you Do not confirm or deny!!! and also shut up dont tell him your past let it be. Whenever i meet my ex with company i smile and say hi and then look away then its nothing to debate about.

]]> by: prou http://haidhuru.blogsome.com/2006/09/15/g-is-for-gone-with-the-wind/#comment-531 Tue, 19 Sep 2006 12:46:21 +0100 http://haidhuru.blogsome.com/2006/09/15/g-is-for-gone-with-the-wind/#comment-531 I agree totally with the <b>Never Explain</b> policy though you the woman are supposed to understand that "that chick there me, I dumped her she is bad news," a question of double standards yet again. I agree totally with the Never Explain policy though you the woman are supposed to understand that “that chick there me, I dumped her she is bad news,” a question of double standards yet again.

]]> by: Ms K http://haidhuru.blogsome.com/2006/09/15/g-is-for-gone-with-the-wind/#comment-530 Mon, 18 Sep 2006 08:42:39 +0100 http://haidhuru.blogsome.com/2006/09/15/g-is-for-gone-with-the-wind/#comment-530 Heh heh you know the way they salimiana when you happen to introduce them, in case he already knew the dude was your ex, with that curt nod. Heh heh and anyway, you cannot introduce any man to your man without acceptable descriptors. Brother and Father are the only ones allowed. Anything else: boss. colleague, cousin, brother-in-law, friend's boyfriend, friend's brother, step-brother.... (you get the drift) are all treated to that curt nod. Don't EVEN try friend. As for ex, only for the foolhardiest among us. Esp to be ignored are those guys who you did-like-they-do-on-the-discovery-channel with. You know those guys who you didn't really have a relationship with. Just animal coupling. Those ones you do not even acknowledge presence. If possible, do the curt nod and stop at that. Trying to explain those ones to your significant other is just bad for your health! Heh heh you know the way they salimiana when you happen to introduce them, in case he already knew the dude was your ex, with that curt nod. Heh heh and anyway, you cannot introduce any man to your man without acceptable descriptors. Brother and Father are the only ones allowed. Anything else: boss. colleague, cousin, brother-in-law, friend’s boyfriend, friend’s brother, step-brother…. (you get the drift) are all treated to that curt nod. Don’t EVEN try friend. As for ex, only for the foolhardiest among us.

Esp to be ignored are those guys who you did-like-they-do-on-the-discovery-channel with. You know those guys who you didn’t really have a relationship with. Just animal coupling. Those ones you do not even acknowledge presence. If possible, do the curt nod and stop at that. Trying to explain those ones to your significant other is just bad for your health!

]]> by: acolyte http://haidhuru.blogsome.com/2006/09/15/g-is-for-gone-with-the-wind/#comment-529 Sat, 16 Sep 2006 16:25:10 +0100 http://haidhuru.blogsome.com/2006/09/15/g-is-for-gone-with-the-wind/#comment-529 It's of how we are being blacklisted like this?! First things first, if you used to date a jamaa we know; that's cool.If it is someone very close to me and both of us are cool with it, that's cool.If your ex was a dude I can't stand or is a bitter rival; that ain't happening!Unless I sliced him of course. You do know with our egos we do like to feel that we are the first and the best, even though deep inside we know that it isnt true. I do think that at times the less said, the better! As for catching pints with both sets of the ex-es.Hell Naw! It’s of how we are being blacklisted like this?!

First things first, if you used to date a jamaa we know; that’s cool.If it is someone very close to me and both of us are cool with it, that’s cool.If your ex was a dude I can’t stand or is a bitter rival; that ain’t happening!Unless I sliced him of course.

You do know with our egos we do like to feel that we are the first and the best, even though deep inside we know that it isnt true.

I do think that at times the less said, the better!

As for catching pints with both sets of the ex-es.Hell Naw!

]]> by: makanga http://haidhuru.blogsome.com/2006/09/15/g-is-for-gone-with-the-wind/#comment-528 Sat, 16 Sep 2006 03:00:50 +0100 http://haidhuru.blogsome.com/2006/09/15/g-is-for-gone-with-the-wind/#comment-528 And er...who is doing the data collection for part deuce? How can a brutha get in with the 'sample group?' <strong><small>OK then! It helps to know the mutumia who's figures out what demographic we need info from ... I usually toss out... I need stats from Busia Stat! and you know... so... speak to me nicely:)</small></strong> And er…who is doing the data collection for part deuce? How can a brutha get in with the ’sample group?’

OK then! It helps to know the mutumia who’s figures out what demographic we need info from … I usually toss out… I need stats from Busia Stat! and you know… so… speak to me nicely:)

]]>